O vale de Chelas entre o Convento de São Félix e Xabregas: uma possibilidade de interpretação, uma hipótese de intervenção
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Na margem norte do estuário rio Tejo, para oriente, entre a cidade primordial e a cidade-satélite dos Olivais, surge o ‘arquipélago fractal’ do vale de Chelas. Pensado também com um satélite, a descontinuidade na execução do plano de urbanização dos anos 60 do século XX provocou um isolamento no conjunto deixando entre si uma sucessão de espaços – incertos na forma como função – que conservam hoje partes de um cadastro original. Se esses ‘espaços incertos’ evidenciam, por um lado, a origem da estrutura urbana da cidade primordial, por outro, agudizam a rotura socio-territorial do ‘arquipélago fractal’ criando momentos de tensão que tendem a torna-los ‘acontecimentos urbanos’. Isto é, a densidade e sequência dos ‘espaços incertos’ criam a potencialidade para uma arquitetura, até ao momento pouco desenvolvida no lugar, que permita a integração holística das partes; ABSTRACT: The existing paths that cross the valley of Chelas were traced and built between the II century B.C. and the XVIII century A.D. This valley is placed within the Tagus basin and supports the water drainage of the eastern side of Lisbon. Understanding the orographic conditions of this area is key to explain the chronological course of its historical dominations. Neighbourhoods close to the valley result from diverse and contrasting urban interventions operated through time. The opportunity to find a comprehensive structure that networks and provides easier acess to the neighbourhoods led to the characterisation of two parallel paths situated on the hillsides of the valley. The two identified paths cover the existing ones, alowing to describe multiple spaces according to their peculiarity and archaeology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".