Participatory Urban Solid Waste Governance in the Global South
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Worldwide urban waste management is a critical public service that if lacking or deficient creates serious problems, affecting the sanitation, public health and general living conditions in the city as well as contributing to global warming and even impacting the wider marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Furthermore, inadequate waste management and lack of waste reduction measures contribute to the waste of natural resources and the contamination of the environment and can further also affect the livelihoods of those who depend on the collection of recyclable materials. Waste governance is emerging as transdisciplinary and inter-sectoral approach to waste management and policy, moving away from a primarily engineering and prescriptive perspective. Waste is more than a sanitary or health problem to be addressed with technological solutions only. The process of governing waste involves the articulation of different structures, institutions, practices and actors. Issues of power, scale, and equity are equally important. Innovative forms of governance are emerging as decentralized, participatory and inclusive, focused on waste reduction and resource recovery. With this article we aim to provide practical knowledge on the contributions of grassroots organizations and networks in waste management, supporting the discussion of good waste governance in specific city contexts. We bring a wide variety of experiences where different forms of waste governance are practiced to showcase their assets and to discuss prevailing challenges. We are informed by a situated urban political ecology perspective, allowing us to address everyday issues of waste generation, management and governance in Brazilian cities and in other parts of the world."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it