Philippines Quarterly Update, December 2011 : Sustaining Growth in Uncertain Times
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After a strong rebound in 2010, \n Philippine economic growth slowed by more than half to 3.6 \n percent in the first three quarters of 2011. Slower third \n quarter (Q3) growth of 3.2 percent was the result of \n significant contractions in exports and public investment. \n The contraction in exports largely reflected weaker demand \n in advanced economies while public investments continued to \n shrink in part because of measures to improve accountability \n of public spending. On the production side, industrial and \n agricultural activities were sluggish, leaving the services \n sector to buoy growth. To improve growth outcome in the \n remainder of the year, the government announced a PHP 72 \n billion (about 0.7 percent of GDP) disbursement acceleration \n plan to ensure that budgeted items are spent by year end. \n After a strong rebound in 2010, Philippine economic growth \n slowed by more than half to 3.6 percent in the first three \n quarters of 2011, bringing year to date growth below the \n government's revised target of 4.5 to 5.5 percent for \n 2011. Q3 growth of 3.2 percent was driven by private \n consumption and inventory build-up, which grew by 7.1 and \n 147.7 percent respectively. The country's slower \n expansion places it behind its neighbors with Indonesia, \n Vietnam, and Singapore growing above 6 percent, Malaysia at \n 5.8 percent, and Thailand, which was devastated by massive \n flooding in recent months, at 3.5 percent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it