Predictors of clinical response to intra-articular Hylan injections - a prospective study using synovial fluid parameters, clinical outcomes and magnetic resonance imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate synovial fluid (SF) and clinical and imaging predictors of clinical response in patients receiving intraarticular Hylan GF-20 injections. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee [OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) grades I-II] were followed over 6 months. SF and clinical and radiographic measures were assessed. Patella and tibial cartilage volume and cartilage defect scores were measured at baseline and 6 months using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary outcome measure was the relationship between SF measures and clinical response as defined by the OARSI-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials responder criteria for OA ("High improvement" >or= 50% improvement in pain or function; absolute change >or= 20 NU on Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire). Secondary outcomes included MRI outcomes (change in cartilage volume and cartilage defect scores). RESULTS: Fifteen patients achieved "High improvement." High baseline SF hyaluronic acid (HA) concentration was a statistically significant predictor of clinical response with odds ratio (OR) 6.04 (p < 0.02). HA concentration was divided into tertiles and fitted to a univariate regression model against clinical response. A baseline HA concentration value of > 2 mg/ml provided the greatest tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity with values of 60% and 77%, respectively, a likelihood ratio of 2.55, and OR of 4.88. Baseline clinical and radiological measures did not predict clinical response in this cohort with mild to moderate OA. Nineteen subjects had MRI at both timepoints. No change was noted in cartilage volumes or cartilage defect scores over 6 months. There was no association between baseline HA concentration and baseline cartilage volume. CONCLUSION: Baseline SF HA concentration predicts clinical response in patients receiving intraarticular Hylan. This has implications for the selection of patients who are likely to respond to this therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".