Physical interation of parathyroid hormone-related protein with the epigenetic regulator Bmi1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a cause of malignancy-induced hypercalcemia, PTHrP (parathyroid hormone-related protein) plays an important role in cell growth and differentiation. This peptide is unique in that it not only acts through membrane receptors but also translocates directly to the nucleus. Studies have shown that the repression of target gene expression is achieved through chromatin modifications induced by the PcG complex. As a core protein of the PcG complex, Bmi1 functions as a transcriptional repressor for various genes involved in development and cell proliferation. Recent studies have indicated that the skeletal phenotypes of PTHrP(1-84) knock-in mice are consistent with ones observed in Bmi1-/- mice in vivo. In addition, the down-regulation of Bmi1 expression was detected in PTHrP(1-84) knock-in mice. Both phenotypes indicate that there is correlation between Bmi1 and PTHrP. However, the molecular mechanism involved in correlation of PTHrP and Bmi1 regulation is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the underlying molecular mechanism of the way of PTHrP regulating Bmi1. We focused on the interaction between PTHrP and Bmi1 in vitro and in vivo system and the consequences exerted by this interaction. At first, co-localization of PTHrP and Bmi1 was demonstrated and the N-terminus of PTHrP was found to be responsible for the interaction both in vivo and in vitro. Second, we set up the repression assays in vivo to identify the promoters' activities and cell survival influenced by this direct interaction. As a result, overexpression of PTHrP and Bmi1 in HEK293 cells was shown to have an effect on p19Arf and Gal4 promoter activities in vivo. Thirdly, increased cell proliferation was detected in HEK293 cells and NIH 3T3 cells with overexpressed PTHrP and Bmi1 together. At the same time, I also discovered the elevation of cell survival rate in HEK293 and NIH 3T3 cells when PTHrP and Mel18 were expressed together. This study provides evidence that the hormone PTHrP physically and functionally interacts with Bmi1 and Mel18 to affect the activities of promoters in the nucleus and regulate cell proliferation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".