MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6995845384

POSTGAME: Rush dump Roughneck rivals in the dome

2025· other· en· W6995845384 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGold rushQuarter (Canadian coin)Rush hourDome (geology)Frame (networking)Heading (navigation)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Miss the post-game show live on the Rush Radio Network? Cody Janzen breaks down the Saskatchewan Rush 's 16-13 win over Calgary with the help of #RushNation ------------------------------------ Despite trailing at the half, the Saskatchewan Rush pulled off a 16-13 win against the Calgary Roughnecks on Friday night in the Saddledome. Ryan Keenan opened the scoring followed up by Mike Messenger in the first quarter as the Rush jumped out to a 4-3 lead. Adam Jay and Austin Shanks found the back of the net in the first frame also. Shanks, Keenan and Zach Manns buried in the second half, but Saskatchewan felt themselves down 9-7 at the half. The Rush found a new gear in the second half, with Levi Anderson, Jake Boudreau and Robert Church brought the game to a 10-10 tie heading into the final quarter. Saskatchewan finished strong after Holden Garlent and Brock Haley put the road team up 12-11, but it was Church, Keenan and Boudreau who sealed the deal, giving the Rush a 16-13 win over the Roughnecks. Austin Shanks, Ryan Keenan and Robert Church all finished the game with seven points. Frank Scigliano made 33 saves in his first game back after the birth of his first child. The Saskatchewan Rush are back on Co-op Field tomorrow when the Rochester Knighthawks come to SaskTel Centre for a 7:00PM start. Tickets for Rowdy's Wedding can be purchased here .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Archive (Internet Archive)Same topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207