Programa de Inducci??n para Integrar a los colaboradores que se incorporan al ??rea administrativa de la Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego de Trujillo, A??o 2015
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis was conducted with the aim of developing an induction program \nthat allows from its implementation the effective integration of new staff of the \nPrivate University Antenor Orrego, as currently the integration of new \nemployees required more time necessary and the new employee goes \nthrough a period of anxiety, causing them insecurity and decreased their \ninitiative and dealing with others by lack of guidance. \n \nThey have participated in the investigation 28 employees who entered to \nwork to the administrative area of the Private University Antenor Orrego in \nthe first quarter of 2015, who were applied a questionnaire prepared for the \npurpose, the design of contrasting used is one box and for data analysis \ndescriptive statistics were used. Integrally it has used the scientific method in \nall stages. \n \nThe results of the research has identified and reported that the Private \nUniversity Antenor Orrego not have an induction program, it was found that \nemployees to join labor did not receive the respective induction process, \nbecoming a possible organizational imbalance for lack of different data and \nrelated information such as policies, rules, rights, benefits, functions, \nstructure, among others, that caused difficulty in integrating new employees \ngenerating in them a period of anxiety, insecurity and decreased their \ninitiative and dealings with others. That is why an induction program was \ndeveloped for the Human Resources of Private University Antenor Orrego \ntake it as a basis for implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".