MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996192820

Reflecting on the old ‘Ralph’

2013· article· en· W6996192820 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoorsDemolitionWhite (mutation)PorchAdministration (probate law)Restructuring
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reflecting on the old ‘Ralph’ The opening of the new Ralph Engelstad Arena on Oct. 5, 2001, was a celebration. The new home of UND Hockey was, and still is by most, considered the greatest college hockey arena in the world. The new "Ralph" ? $100-plus million stunner ? replaced the old Ralph Engelstad Arena, which is being demolished to eventually make way for a new indoor athletics complex. Check out the demolition process at UNDsports.com. The old Ralph, a building with a vibrant history, was a benchmark in hockey arenas after its completion and far ahead of its predecessor, the UND Winter Sports Building. The Winter Sports Building's nickname ? the "Barn" ? was not a stretch by any imagination. Built as a Works Progress Administration project in 1936 for $46,000, The Barn was a glorified Quonset that offered fans little respite from the often harsh weather conditions outside. The white haze of chilly breath from players and fans alike was a familiar site inside the unheated structure. Coats and hats rarely came off, and if they did, only briefly. A more 'fan-friendly' home The process to construct a more fan-friendly arena began in the late 1960's. University and community leaders raised nearly $2 million in funding, which included: $800,000 in student bonds $500,000 from the Edmond A. Hughes Estate $240,000 from Alumni across the nation and special funds $460,000 from a local fund drive led by UND alumnus, John O'Keefe The 87,000-square-foot "Winter Sport Center," as it was first dubbed, opened its doors Nov. 10, 1972. The modern, heated facility offered fans protection from the outdoor elements and contemporary comforts as they cheered UND to a 5-4 win over Colorado College in the first game held there. Development continued on the building in 1983 with the addition of a $750,000 foyer. The arena grew to be 100,816 square feet with 5,700 seats available. UND Hockey continued to grow with the arena, becoming one of the most respected programs in Division I NCAA hockey. In 1988, the Winter Sports Center was renamed after Ralph Engelstad, a 1954 UND graduate and goalie from Thief River Falls, Minn., after he pledged more than $5 million to his alma mater's hockey program. A successful businessman and Las Vegas casino owner, Engelstad would eventually give UND its single-largest donation for the construction of its current hockey home ? the new Ralph Engelstad Arena. Old Ralph's legacy UND defeated the University of Manitoba 4-1 in the last game played in the old Ralph on Sept. 28, 2001. Some facts about the 29-year tenure of the old Ralph and the teams that called it home include: 593 games played 400-171-22 record (.69 percent) 5 national titles 7 league titles 21 First Team All-Americans 24 NCAA All-Tournament Team members 16 WCHA All-Tournament Team members 5 NCAA tournament MVPs 5 WCHA Player of the Year awards 6 WCHA Coach of the Year awards 3 National Coach of the Year Awards (Spencer Penrose Award) 2 WCHA tournament MVPs 2 WCHA Defensive Player of the Year awards 2 WCHA Rookie of the Year awards 2 WCHA Freshman of the Year awards 17 National Team members 23 National Juniors The magnetic legacy of that old arena was as endearing to UND's opponents as it was to the fans. In a 1999 WCHA directed survey, seven of 10 league captains listed the old Ralph as either their favorite arena to play in or the toughest setting for a visiting team. Brian Johnson University and Public Affairs writer

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.008
Scholarly communication0.0130.009
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0040.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0590.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)Same topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207