MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996301559

Review of <i>A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial\nin the Americas, 1492 to the Present</i> By\nWard Churchill

2000· article· en· W6996301559 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInsecta mundi · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenocideThe HolocaustNazismFrontierIndigenousNarrativeDenialPopulationJudaism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ward Churchill opens the X-Files of American history to examine the phenomenon of genocide in eight essays (some published previously) prefaced by a statement by David Stannard. In American historiography, discussions of genocide float unreally, separated and unanchored in any systematic, analytic context: discussion of the Nazi holocaust over here, denial of the American genocide over there, humanitarian bombings somewhere else. Churchill has prowled disparate literatures human rights, American frontier history, Native American history, history of the Nazi holocaust-to bring back the information relevant to American history and build it into a single comparative discussion set in a single analytic landscape. That is no place for a historian; Churchill's fields are communications and American Indian studies.\nFirst embracing Raphael Lemkin's 1944 definition of genocide, Churchill discusses and rejects holocaust denial and Jewish exclusiveness: respectively, the arguments that the Nazi holocaust never occurred and that it was the only authentic occurrence of genocide. Turning his attention to the history of the Western Hemisphere, he compares the careers of Christopher Columbus and Heinrich Himmler, both of whom acted on behalf of a sponsoring state to "encounter" and extract other peoples' resources using other peoples' labor and causing roughly the same number of deaths.\nA chronological narrative of the genocide of the indigenous population of Latin America from 1492 to 1992 addresses arguments that ignore, deny, or try to minimize the dimensions of that genocide. The next essay applies the same method to "North America," that is, America north of Mexico. Churchill then interprets the Cold War in the US and Canada in terms of internal colonialism and finds its effects on North American indigenous communities "patently genocidal."\nLooking back to the global stage, Churchill recounts the role of the United States in undermining the United Nations Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the aftermath of World War II. When Lemkin coined the term, genocide included "cultural genocide," defined as any form of "planned disintegration of the political, social, or economic structure of a group or nation," and "systematic moral debasement of a group, people, or nation." The United States with Canada and some other nations caused all forms of genocide except "physical genocide," the systematic killing of a targeted group, to be removed from the Convention before its adoption. This collection of essays concludes with a survey of the literary career of genocide as a concept and a proposed convention that restores Lemkin's concept. Readers who want to believe will welcome this pioneering work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInsecta mundiSame topicHistorical and Contemporary Political DynamicsFrench-language works237,207