MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996358886

The role of self efficacy in constraints negotiation : rural Nova Scotia physical education teachers ability to implement outdoor education

2012· dissertation· en· W6996358886 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicOutdoor and Experiential Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)AttendanceNegotiationNova scotiaNatural (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous research has highlighted a noticeable shift from humans, especially
\nchildren and youth, engaging in activities in natural environments to an increasing
\ntendency to participate in sedentary activities in front of a screen. Nova Scotia has taken
\nsteps to reduce the disconnect from the natural environment many youth are
\nexperiencing through implementation of a Grade 10 Outdoor Pursuits module into the
\npublic education system. However, even with the support of the province of Nova Scotia
\nand school boards, research indicates that experience and attitudinal barriers of teachers
\nimplementing outdoor education are as compelling as economic and logistical barriers.
\nThe purpose of this study was to increase understanding of outdoor education in two
\nNova Scotia school boards through analysis of teachers? experiences on the ground. In
\nparticular, understanding the constraints teachers face implementing and delivering the
\nOutdoor Pursuits module and the relationship between physical education teachers?
\nmotivation and perceived self-efficacy, and how they negotiated the constraints they do
\nface. Overall, teachers? implementing the module identified with the importance of
\ngetting students outside in their own backyards in the hope of promoting lifelong learning
\nand physically active lifestyles. However, the findings illustrated that although a strong
\nfocus of the province and school boards has been on acquiring the physical supports
\nneeded, such as equipment and resources, developing self-efficacy of teachers and
\nbuilding social networks was more influential to participation levels. Key amongst the
\nmajor influences in developing teachers? self-efficacy with Outdoor Pursuits were being
\ncomfortable with and exhibiting a mastery of activities, experiencing the pursuits under
\nthe guidance of someone else who could successfully model it, and receiving peer
\nsupport, feedback and discussion to stimulate excitement and the acquisition of
\nknowledge. The evidence from this study indicates that training, the provision of
\nmentors, and creating a structure of peer support are vital to raising teachers? confidence,
\nthereby enabling them to successfully negotiate future constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University)Same topicOutdoor and Experiential EducationFrench-language works237,207