MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996423005

Risk management with reinsurance policies

2020· dissertation· en· W6996423005 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Portfolio Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinsuranceRisk managementStochastic controlAsset (computer security)Risk measureControl (management)Markov processRisk Control
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Businesses face various risks that may negatively influence their operations, therefore implementing strategies to deal with risks is important. In recent years, risk management has become an active area of research in finance and insurance. The primary goals of risk management include identifying, assessing and controlling risks to minimize their potential impact. For insurance companies, reinsurance is an effective risk management tool to control risks. As a natural measure of risk, we consider the ruin probability of an insurance business. Our ultimate objective is to evaluate the impact of reinsurance in risk management, particularly in minimizing the ruin probability, and to find the corresponding optimal reinsurance policies. We first study the problem of minimizing the ruin probability in a discrete-time risk model with unknown parameters. A proportional reinsurance is purchased to control the ruin probability. We formulate the problem as a Markov decision process and solve this problem by means of discrete-time dynamic programming. The Bayesian approach is applied to address the issue of parameter uncertainty. We obtain the explicit expressions of minimum ruin probabilities and the corresponding optimal reinsurance strategies. Some structural properties of ruin probabilities are investigated under certain conditions. We also consider an optimization problem by joint decisions of excess-of-loss reinsurance and investment in a continuous-time financial market. The reserve may be invested in a financial market consisting of a risk-free asset and a risky asset with the price process follows geometric Brownian motion. Borrowing is allowed, however, the interest rate of borrowing is higher than the return rate of risk-free. Meanwhile, an excess-of-loss reinsurance is purchased. We apply stochastic control theory and Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation to find the optimal strategy of joint reinsurance and investment decisions, and derive the closed form expression of the minimum ruin probability function. Our results are illustrated numerically. Both theoretical and numerical results show that reinsurance has a significant effect in alleviating the risk of ruin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicRisk and Portfolio OptimizationFrench-language works237,207