MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996524218

Sonic Crystal Acoustic Attenuation Applied to Exhaust Air Systems

2023· article· en· W6996524218 on OpenAlexafffundvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNoise (video)Finite element methodAcoustic attenuationNoise controlAcoustic impedanceAttenuationInertiaTransfer matrixDiscretizationStructural acoustics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a society where most people spend their time inside buildings or vehicles, the need to filter the air is essential to ensure a certain level of comfort. While incorporating an exhaust fan into these enclosed spaces improves air quality, noise is generated and often creates discomfort. Better fan design helps reduce noise, but even with good design, uncomfortable noise pollution remains. To block the noise generated by the fan, without however blocking the airflow, an acoustic metacage, made of sonic crystals, can be used, taking advantage of their stop-bandproperties. This work presents a discretized modeling by transfer matrices of a network of sonic crystals that can form such a metacage. Like the finite element method, the approach discretizes the crystal lattice by periodic elements. Each periodic element is assembled to the others, either in series or in parallel, according to the serial or parallel transfer matrix methods. Thus, complex shapes of crystals can be modeled to better adapt to a medium with flow (e.g. : NACA profile). The modeling is applied to cylindrical crystals of different diameters under normal acoustic incidence. The results of the modeling are compared to sound transmission loss measurements made in an impedance tube without flow. The comparisons are good, but a correction must be made to certain elements to consider the inertia added by the constrictions between the crystals. Such a correction is proposed in this work based on a geometrical tortuosity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207