MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996654514

Skeletal Abundance and Diversity in the Lower Ordovician Catoche and Fillmore Formations: Tracing the Roots of the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event

2022· article· en· W6996654514 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSmith ScholarWorks (Smith College) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrdovicianBenthic zoneSedimentary depositional environmentAbundance (ecology)PaleoecologyReefFaunaTrace fossil
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE) is known for a significant increase in skeletal abundance of benthic faunas globally, yet the progression of this evolutionary change throughout the Lower Ordovician leading up to this event is unconstrained. We examined Lower Ordovician carbonate deposits from the Catoche Formation, Western Newfoundland, Canada, and Fillmore Formation, western Utah, USA, to quantify skeletal abundance and identify depositional environment(s) which may have influenced temporal changes in abundance. Petrographic studies suggest the Catoche Formation has a low skeletal abundance of 1.7% fossil material in thin section, including unidentified skeletal material, where trilobites make up 37.1% of total fossils; cephalopods make up 22.2% of total fossils, brachiopods make up 9.3%, echinoderms make up 2.1%, and gastropods make up 0.5%. Field observations additionally demonstrate abundant peloidal and micritic sediment and an abundance of flat-pebble conglomerates, demonstrating the common occurrence of storm events at the locality. The Fillmore Formation records different skeletal abundance, where skeletal material makes up 17.0% of total counts of thin sections. Most abundant fossils of the Fillmore Formation are echinoderms (55.1%), brachiopods (19.9%), sponges (16.4%) and trilobites (6.4%). Field observations also suggest a higher-energy shallow marine paleoenvironmental setting more proximal to sponge reefs that did not undergo frequent storm events compared to the Catoche Formation. Differences in skeletal abundance and paleoenvironmental settings leads us to conclude skeletal production may have been higher in shallow marine environments, adjacent to sponge reefs, than lower-energy shallow shelves less proximal to them. My work seeks to understand the varying occurrences of skeletal biomass in the two Lower Ordovician localities and what implications it holds for the initial radiation of the GOBE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it