MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6996715542

Structural, chemical and nutrient characterization of original feed stock and co-products from a newly built biofuel plant in Saskatchewan

2013· article· en· W6996715542 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiofuelNutrientStock (firearms)Renewable energyRenewable resource
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to determine the structural, chemical and nutrient variation associated with different batches of original feedstock grain (wheat) and co-products (wheat distillers dried grain with solubles, wDDGS) from bioethanol processing and to study possibility of using molecular spectroscopy FT/IR-ATR technique as a rapid tool of identifying the structure spectral differences among the batches. The samples were collected from different batches of wheat and wDDGS produced from the same and newly build bioethanol plant in western Canada with updated bioethanol processing technology.. The results of chemical composition analysis showed significant differences (P<0.05) among the batches of wheat and among the batches of wDDGS. The variation in term of range among the batches of wheat for crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) were 2.1, 2.5 and 1.0 %DM, respectively. Among the batches of wDDGS, the variation in CP, NDF and ADF were 3.9, 5.2 and 3.8 %DM, respectively. The soluble crude protein (SCP) content ranged by 7.2% of CP among the batches of wheat and by 4.2% of CP among the batches of wDDGS. In mineral profiles, variation among the batches of wheat and wDDGS in sulfur were 0.03 and 0.34 % of DM, respectively. In mineral profiles, higher phosphorus and sulfur content associated with wDDGS could be a concern. The sulfur content ranged by 0.3 % of DM among the batches of wDDGS with a mean of 1.1 %DM. For the estimated subfractions with Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS), the immediately rumen available PA fraction (NPN) ranged by 14.8 % of CP among the batches of wheat and by 2.7 % of CP among batches of wDDGS. The particle size analysis revealed the small particle size in all three batches of wDDGS with the geometric mean of ranging from 650-690 µm. In situ rumen degradation kinetic results showed a significant differences (P<0.05) among both wheat and wDDGS batches. Multivariate molecular spectral analyses showed a potential of using FT/IR molecular vibrational spectroscopy as a rapid method to identify structure difference associated with different batches. In conclusion, the structural, chemical and nutrient availability vary among the batches of wheat and among the batches of wDDGS. The molecular spectroscopy shows a potential as a rapid tool to identify batch difference in chemical and nutrient profiles and to detect the response of functional group to bioethanol processing. Further study is needed to analyse molecular spectral characteristics in details for development of a successful identification tool to identify batch differences. The variation among the batches of wDDGS should be considered in ration formulation especially at high inclusion rates (40-50% wDDGS in diet DM) even the co-products are produced from the same bioethanol plant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library - University of Saskatchewan (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207