A study of the awareness of the staff of SALCRA on an enhancement of 5S principles and practices / Embrose Naji, Bibiana Manggai & Bill Thomas Junggu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate about the awareness of the staffs of SALCRA Kedup One and SALCRA Kedup Two for the importance of extending the 5S principles and practices to their family or to their home. The survey has shown that more than three quarter of the respondents are not aware of the importance of extending and promoting the 5S principles and practices to their family. The main reasons is because of their low educational background and also lack of awareness for extending its principles and practices to their home. They thought that the 5S principles and practices are only applicable at their work place only. Majority of the remaining respondents are ignorant of practicing it at home eventhough they are aware of it. The survey results also shows that more than half of the respondents are not quite sure of the benefits of 5S to their daily life eventhough they have heard about it before. However, majority ( more than 80% ) of the respondents agreed for the extention and promotion of the 5S principles and practices to their family after they have understood of its importance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".