Status of the Oklahoma Food and Agricultural Industry in a Competitive Global Environment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In January of 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) created the largest single free trade market in the world containing well over 360 million consumers.By dropping the trade barriers between Mexico, the United States and Canada, the forward thinking governments of these nations opened the door to possibilities that then, could only be imagined (p.42). Furthermore, Stabler's (1998) article focused on Mexican andCanadian trade with Oklahoma and neighboring states.In 1996, nearly one-third of all goods imported to and exported from the U.S. were traded with Canada and Mexico, and the total trade with these countries was in excess of $421 billion.Total exports to Mexico from the states of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Iowa and Michigan stood at $32 billion by the close of 1996.Total exports to Canada from the same six states were in excess of $30.5 billion.It is interesting to note that well over 50 percent of the United States' exports to Mexico during 1996 were from these six centrally located states.In addition, well over 23 percent of all U.S. exports to Canada came from the same six states (p.42).Today's economy is no longer the domestic economy of our forefathers.In order to compete in today's business climate you must broaden your horizons and seek markets outside the United States.Consumers are worldwide and so are the markets that serve them.U.S. companies can no longer survive just serving U.S. consumers.How do U.S. petroleum pipeline manufacturer's stay in business considering the U.S. oil boom
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it