MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6996809762

“TO THOSE WHO SAY WE ARE ASSIMILATED, I SAY HOGWASH!”: A HISTORY OF THE WYANDOT OF ANDERDON DAY SCHOOL EXPERIENCE, 1790 TO 1915

2023· dissertation· en· W6996809762 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismIndigenousScholarshipTraditional knowledgeGovernment (linguistics)PoliticsSurpriseIndigenous education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the early seventeenth century, the Wendat/Wandat have engaged with colonial education and other strategies of adaptation to ensure their community’s survival. It is of little surprise that in the 1800s, acknowledging their place in a growing settler society, the Wyandot of Anderdon Nation requested western-style schools. For the Wendat/Wandat, adopting western-style education was not an act of conciliation or defeat; it was deft political maneuvering and a way to help maintain Wendat/Wandat continuity throughout the Wendat/Wandat diaspora. This dissertation counters Indigenous education scholarship which argues that western-style schooling seeks to erase Indigenous ways of knowledge and replace it with Settler systems of knowing. Moreover, this dissertation builds on diaspora and Wendat/Wandat studies, which highlight how the Wendat/Wandat relied on pre-diaspora traditions by utilizing educational strategies to ensure community and cultural survivance. Through an ethnohistoric approach and decolonizing methodologies, this dissertation uses colonial government records, missionary accounts, as well as private collections from the Wyandot of Anderdon Nation to reveal a model of a cooperative, rather than forced, schooling. In 1846, the Wyandot of Anderdon Nation opened an Indigenous-run western-style school near Windsor, Ontario. Through this case study, a long-established pattern of mixing Settler knowledge and Indigenous epistemologies is revealed, reinforcing the argument that incorporating colonial education did not result in a rejection of Wendat/ Wandat teachings. The Wendat/Wandat developed a cultural matrix where both Wendat/Wandat and non-Wendat/Wandat practices existed simultaneously. As a result, Wendat/Wandat students continued to preserve and pass on community knowledge for future generations while also understanding and navigating the increasingly hostile Settler states of Canada and the United States in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0310.016
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→