A systematic approach for identifying the psychological health and work-related determinants of occupational disability in a target sector
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cliquez ici pour la version française de ce rapport_x000D_ La difficulté à se maintenir au travail en raison d’un problème de santé psychologique constitue une préoccupation sociale grandissante. Les auteurs ont voulu développer une approche systématique pour identifier les déterminants de l’incapacité à maintenir une vie professionnelle active chez le travailleur ayant des difficultés psychologiques. Pour ce faire, ils ont élaboré et effectué une première validation de deux outils à l’intention des milieux de travail : un dispositif d’enquête permettant d’identifier les déterminants, la prévalence et la distribution de la détresse psychologique et du présentéisme et un outil ergonomique pour décrire et évaluer la charge de travail et ses déterminants dans l’activité de travail. Cette étude innove en proposant des outils pré-testés, qui interrogent le travail prescrit et réel des employés en termes de difficultés ressenties, tout en tenant compte de la charge de travail ressentie par eux. Elle documente à la fois les facteurs liés à l’environnement de travail et ceux liés à l’environnement de l’individu. Le Journal de bord élaboré par les chercheurs, le questionnaire Estime de soi en tant que travailleur et la version française du Work Role Limitation Questionnaire sont inclus dans le rapport._x000D_ Abstract_x000D_ The difficulty of remaining at work because of a mental health problem is a growing social preoccupation. The authors wanted to develop a systematic approach for identifying the determinants of the inability of a worker with psychological difficulties to maintain an active professional life. To do this, they developed and performed an initial validation of two tools intended for workplaces: an investigation tool for identifying the determinants, prevalence and distribution of psychological distress and presenteeism, and an ergonomic tool for describing and evaluating the workload and its determinants in the work activity. This work is innovative in proposing pretested tools that question the employees’ prescribed and real work in terms of the difficulties felt, while taking into account the workload that they feel. It documents the factors related to the work environment as well as those related to the individual’s environment. The Journal de Bord (Log) developed by the researchers, the questionnaire Estime de soi en tant que travailleur (self esteem as a worker) and the French version of the Work Role Limitation Questionnaire are included in the report.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.050 | 0.063 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".