Traduction féministe et queer : l’ironie dans Hench de Natalie Zina Walschots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans ce mémoire, j’étudie Hench de Natalie Zina Walschots en tant qu’espace ironique où des dimensions queers et féministes cohabitent en anglais, puis dans une traduction. Cette œuvre se distingue par sa perspective unique sur les sbires des vilain·es, qui remet en question les conventions du genre des super-héros·ïnes dans un revirement de valeurs ironique. Dans cette étude, je commence par analyser les éléments du texte lui-même à travers ses lieux et personnages queers, puis je me concentre sur une analyse féministe par l’utilisation de mécanismes usuels des comics books. Par la suite, j’utilise la traduction pour faire ressortir ces éléments d’analyse en explorant des théories traductologiques et des stratégies queers et féministes. Je propose ensuite des extraits de traduction qui me permettent de positionner mes choix de traduction dans un cadre ironique, pour que la volonté féministe apparente de Hench ne soit pas perdue en contexte queer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".