MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6997056749

Unconventional ferroelectric behavior in nanosegregating liquid crystals with de Vries-like behavior

2010· article· en· W6997056749 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueStrathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFerroelectricityLiquid crystalTilt (camera)CurvaturePhase (matter)Phase transitionAtmospheric temperature rangePolarization (electrochemistry)Pyroelectricity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two nanosegregating siloxane-terminated mesogens with chiral (S,S)-2,3-epoxyoctyloxy side chains (E6, E11 )have been synthesized. These compounds form chiral SmA∗ and SmC∗ phases and show an untypical behavior of the spontaneous polarization which increases with decreasing temperature in a convex manner while the tilt angle saturates. We compare these results with results obtained for two similar mesogens with chiral (R,R)-2,3-difluorooctyloxy side chains (F6, F11), which both show a typical concave curvature with decreasing temperature. A theoretical explanation is given for the unexpected temperature dependency of the spontaneous polarization. The materials also exhibited first-order SmC∗-SmA∗ phase transitions and hence, very high values of the tilt angle. All substances show increased de Vries character in the range of 50%, which is substantially higher than 20% for the nonsiloxane analogs. Furthermore, for the latter materials, second-order phase transitions are common, while the siloxane materials exhibit first-order SmA∗-SmC∗ phase transitions. These results clearly suggest that the achievement of nanosegregation is a powerful tool to induce de Vries behavior and to promote first-order SmA∗-SmC∗ phase transitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)Same topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207