Utilização do ORC( Western Ontário Rotator Cuff Index) e ultrassonografia do ombro para avaliação de qualidade de vida de pacientes submetidos à osteossìntese do úmero com haste intramedular bloqueada com acesso anterógrado
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: This study evaluates the quality of life through the WORC Protocol (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index --- Validated for Brazil) for 5 different domains (Physical Symptoms, Sports / Recreation, Work, Lifestyle, Emotions) from patients submitted to humeral fractures fixation with antegrade locked intramedullary nailing. The study demonstrates the consequences after the implantation of the rotator cuff transfixation and helps in decision making for treatments of these fractures. Methods: Search and Call of patients (N=26) were submitted to Humerus Osteosynthesis with Antegrade Locked Intramedullary Nailing for evaluation of the quality of life through the WORC Protocol. Mann---Whitney test was used to evaluate the association between numerical variables (age, last surgery and quality of life scores) and the Chi---Square and Fisher tests for the categorical variables (sex, laterality, dominance, work leave). We used p <0.05 for significance. Results: The overall WORC score was 82.75 ± 17.00 (Mean + SD) and was not different considering sex, age and postoperative period. Among the WORC domains, both Work and Sport / Recreation Protocols were the most unfavorable factors in the evaluation of patients, with a mean of 10.54 ± 9.00 and 7.36 ± 8.44, respectively. Although not statistically significant, those who had the procedure on the dominant side presented a lower quality of life score (78.1 ±18.9) than those who had surgery on the non---dominant side (86.7 ± 13.9, p = 0.20). Although non significant again, those who were away from work had an overall lower quality of life score (69.2 ± 21.1) than those who were not (85.9 ± 14.2, p = 0.10). Conclusions: Intramedullary nailing with antegrade access can be used to treat fractures of thehumerus without compromising the quality of life of patients. Although it is a safe implant option, considerations for its indication regarding work return and sports or recreational practices should be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".