Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this presentation in Black Studies' Black Bag Speakers Series, Donovan Scribes moderates a panel discussion with Walidah Imarisha, Gwen Carr, and Cleo Davis about the personal and historical significance of Black names. Donovan Scribes is a prominent award-winning writer, speaker, producer, and multi-faceted creative serving the greater Portland community. Walidah Imarisha is an educator, writer, and public scholar. She is an assistant professor in the Black Studies Department at Portland State University and the Director of the PSU Center for Black Studies. She has co-edited two anthologies, Octavia's Brood and Another World is Possible, and is the author of Angels with Dirty Faces, winner of an Oregon Book Award in 2017. Gwen Carr is a research historian who was the primary contributor to the Oregon Black Pioneers' book Perseverance: A History of African Americans in Oregon's Marion and Polk Counties. She is an emeritus board member of the Oregon Black Pioneers and has curated exhibits on Black history for the Oregon Historical Society. Since her retirement from SAIF Corporation in 2003, she continues her work supporting the mission of OBP to research and honor the lives of Black Oregonians. Cleo Davis is an artist whose work includes the Historic Black Williams Project and the Alberta Street Black Heritage Markers (with Kayin Talton Davis). He and Kayin Talton Davis were Artists in Residence with the City of Portland Archives in 2018. His work in Portland's historically Black neighborhoods combines cultural and creative arts with historic preservation and urban development, critically confronting issues of displacement and gentrification and uplifting Black presence and experience in the city.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".