MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6997872811

أدب الرحلات لكارل طومبسون في جولة ربع اسيا لمحمد ثابت

2023· dissertation· id· W6997872811 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueeTheses of Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University (Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural and Religious Practices in Indonesia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRomanceSquare (algebra)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRAK
\n
\nJaulah fi Rubu’I Asia merupakan catatan perjalanan yang menyajikan perjalanan Muhammad Tsabit ke seperempat benua Asia. Dalam catatan perjalanannya, Tsabit menjelaskan tentang kebudayaan yang terdapat di negara-negara yang dikunjunginya, serta keajaiban dan keunikan di dalamnya. Pada setiap pengalaman yang dialaminya, penulis memberikan pendapat dan mengungkapkan perasaannya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa penggambaran dunia khusunya di India dalam buku Jaualah fi Rubu’I Asia, mengungkap bentuk subjektivitas penulis terhadap apa yang dialaminya selama perjalanan, dan mengungkapkan budaya daerah yang dikunjungi serta melihat reaksi atau respon penulis terhadapnya. Untuk mengkajinya, peneliti menggunakan teori travel writing Carl Thompson yang memiliki tiga konsep dasar, yaitu reporting the world, revealing the self, dan representating the other. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Data dalam penelitian ini berupa kutipan, kata, atau kalimat dalam buku Jualah fi Rubu’I Asia. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik baca-tulis. Sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan model analisis Miles & Huberman. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah dunia yang dilaporkan diungkapkan melalui penggambaran budaya dalam berbagai aspek yang dituliskan oleh penulis secara deskriptif dan objektif. Dalam menggambarkan kebudayaan tersebut penulis juga memberikan subjektifitasnya melalui asumsi dan perasaan yang diungkapkannya. Oleh karena itu, penulis digolongkan ke dalam romantic traveler. Penulis menggunakan strategi wacana kolonial dalam tulisannya, dimana other dipresentasikan sebagai pihak inferior sekaligus pihak superior.
\n
\nABSTRACT
\n
\nJaulah fi Rubu'I Asia is a travelogue that presents Muhammad Tsabit's journey to a quarter of the Asian continent. In his travel notes, Tsabit describes the cultures of the countries he visited, as well as their wonders and uniqueness. For each experience, the author gives his opinion and expresses his feelings. The purpose of this study is to analyze the depiction of the world, especially in India, in the book Jaualah fi Rubu'I Asia, reveal the author's subjectivity to what he experienced during the trip, and reveal the culture of the region visited and see the author's reaction or response to it. To study it, the researcher uses Carl Thompson's travel writing theory which has three basic concepts, namely reporting the world, revealing the self, and representing the other. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. The data in this study are in the form of quotations, words, or sentences in the book Jualah fi Rubu'I Asia. The data collection technique used reading-writing technique. While the data analysis technique uses the Miles & Huberman analysis model. The result of this research is that the reported world is expressed through the depiction of culture in various aspects written by the author descriptively and objectively. In describing the culture, the author also gives his subjectivity through the assumptions and feelings he expresses. Therefore, the author is classified as a romantic traveler. The author uses a colonial discourse strategy in his writing, where the other is presented as both inferior and superior. 
\n
\nمستخلص البحث
\n
\nجولة في ربع اسيا هو كتاب رحلات يقدم رحلة محمد ثابت إلى ربع القارة الآسيوية. يصف ثابت في ملاحظات رحلته ثقافات البلدان التي زارها، فضلاً عن عجائبها وتفردها. لكل تجربة، يعطي المؤلف رأيه ويعبر عن مشاعره. الغرض من هذه الدراسة هو تحليل تصوير العالم، وخاصة في الهند، في كتاب جولة في ربع اسيا، والكشف عن ذاتية المؤلف لما عاشه خلال الرحلة، والكشف عن ثقافة المنطقة التي زارها وشاهدها. رد فعل المؤلف أو رده عليه. لدراستها، استخدمت الباحثة نظرية كارل طومسون في أدب الرحلات والتي لها ثلاثة مفاهيم أساسية، وهي الإبلاغ عن العالم، وكشف الذات، وتمثيل الآخر. منهج البحث المستخدم وصفي نوعي. البيانات الواردة في هذه الدراسة في شكل اقتباسات أو كلمات أو جمل في كتاب جولة في ربع اسيا. استخدمت تقنية جمع البيانات أسلوب القراءة والكتابة. بينما تستخدم تقنية تحليل البيانات نموذج تحليل مايلز وهوبرمان. نتيجة هذا البحث أن العالم المبلغ عنه يتم التعبير عنه من خلال تصوير الثقافة في جوانب مختلفة كتبها المؤلف ذاتية وموضوعية. في وصف الثقافة، يعطي المؤلف أيضًا شخصيته من خلال الافتراضات والمشاعر التي يعبر عنها. لذلك، يصنف المؤلف على أنه رحال رومانسي. يستخدم المؤلف استراتيجية الخطاب الاستعماري في كتاباته، حيث يتم تقديم الآخر على أنه أدنى مستوى ومتفوق.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.320
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0080.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it