“Abinōcī tagosin” (child has arrived): A story of community engagement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A newborn child has the ability to create sound and cry as they enter into the physical world. Each moment of birth is a special occasion for all living beings of Mother Earth. Indigenous peoples of Canada and the world have known the significance of what birthing means from a spiritual and holistic understanding. In Saskatchewan, and arguably throughout the world, there is a lack of research on maternal health care policies and procedures which can incorporate an Indigenous worldview led by Indigenous peoples and communities that safely support Indigenous mothers, newborns, families and communities. \nThis project provides the reader with an Indigenous perspective from an Indigenous Registered Nurse and mother who has seen the inequities and the overt systemic racism that occurs not only in maternal health care but throughout the health care system. The mothers and health care providers who supported this work and see a need for changing a system that does not work for all individuals have shared their stories and sacred stories in this thesis. Results/findings from the stories have highlighted that systemic racism and inequities continue to exist in the maternal health care world. It is imperative that the health care system begins dismantling the current system and restructuring a transformed system that works best for all individuals who enter and expect safe, ethical and competent health care. It is with the voices, knowledge and wisdom of my ancestors that I began to establish my voice in hopes that this will benefit the future generations of all our Nations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.037 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".