Annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the European Communities 2005. 10314/06, 8 June 2006
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The European Security Strategy adopted in December 2003 remained the main guidance for the European Union Common Foreign and Security Policy in 2005.During this crucial and turbulent year continuous efforts have been made by the Member States and the EU institutions to purposefully and in a pro-active manner to address the main threats and challenges identified by the ESS working towards a truly common and consolidated CFSP.In order to deal successfully with growing complexity and the scale of the emerging threats and challenges the EU pursued its objectives through and in close cooperation with different multilateral organisations, principally the UN; with international organisations like OSCE and Council of Europe among others; with variety of regional organisations, and working at the same time very closely with partners and non-state actors.The ever-increasing range of topics on which the EU works together with the US, among them promotion of the democracy, Rule of Law and Human Rights worldwide, promotion of peace and security, prosperity, progress and good governance in the Middle East, Africa, on the Balkans and, non-proliferation and fight against terrorism bears testimony to the dynamism and vital character of the transatlantic partnership.The EU has also enhanced significantly its economic, political and cultural ties with Canada, Japan, India, China, Russia and many other countries. EU´s External Action in the Fight against TerrorismThe fight against terrorism has been a constant main priority of the CFSP.The London bombings proved, as did the Madrid events before, that the EU and Member States are still steps behind the perpetrators of violence.In December 2005, the European Council adopted the European Union Counter-Terrorism Strategy which outlines the general framework of EU action in the field of counter-terrorism and is complemented by a detailed Action Plan.The European Council also adopted a Strategy for Combating Radicalisation and Recruitment to terrorism, concentrating on Islamist terrorism, which poses the most serious threat to Europe at this moment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.018 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".