An apparatus and method of feeding a feed slurry into a separating device
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present invention provides an apparatus (1) and method for feeding a feed slurry into a device for separating low density particles from the feed slurry. The apparatus (1) comprises a conduit (4, 6, 8) having a slurry inlet (3), a gas feed inlet (5), a plurality of hollow tubes (10) and an outlet (7). The hollow tubes (10) are configured to combine the feed slurry from the slurry inlet (3) and gas from the gas feed inlet (5). The hollow tubes (10) comprise a porous section (16) to generate bubbles of substantially uniform size into the slurry for adhering to the low density particles. Slurry flows in axially aligned hollow tubes as gas is introduced through the porous sections into the slurry. Alternatively, slurry flows around hollow tubes arranged perpendicular to the conduit longitudinal axis as gas is discharged through the porous sections into the slurry. PCT/AU2018/050725, Australian Application No. 2018303328, Brazilian Application No. 11 2020 000928 8, Canadian Application No. 3,069,340, Chilean Application No. 128-2020, Chinese Application No. 201880048005.8, Eurasian Application No. 202090280, European Application No. 18834891.6, Mexican Application No. MX/a/2020/000585, Peruvian Application No. 000083-2020/DIN, US Application No. 16/631787, South African Application No. 2019/08581.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it