MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6998818075

ANDROGEN REPLACEMENT THERAPY IN POSTMENOPAUSE

2008· article· en· W6998818075 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAndrogenLibidoEstrogenTestosterone (patch)PopulationAndrogen deficiencyHormone replacement therapy (female-to-male)Endocrine system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Androgen administration for hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausalwomen has recently been involved in many panels and investigations. The objective forthe introduction of androgen replacement in postmenopausal women was the opinionthat impaired libido and well-being in women with normal estrogen concentration (withHRT or in reproductive period) is the consequence of androgen deficiency.Physiology of female androgen production in women emphasizes the production ofdehydroepiandrosteron (DHEA) as crucial precursor of human sex steroid biosynthesistogether with its sulphate ester (DHEAS). DHEA and DHEAS do not have androgen activityunless they are converted to testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, which can both bind and activate androgen receptor. The ability of ovarian theca cells to synthesize androgenspersists also after menopause, the fact being illustrated by finding that bilateral oophorectomy in postmenopausal women leads to a significant decrease in circulating levels ofandrogen. The definition of female androgen deficiency syndrom (FADS) was presentedas Princeton’s consensus meeting three criteria: impaired libido and well-being with normal estrogen values (established estrogen replacement) and serum androgen concentrations below or within the lower quartile of the female normal range. The criticism of Princeton’s consensus is focused mainly on loose definition of impaired libido. The similar critical estimation followed new diagnostic term »hypoactive sexual desire disorder« (HSDD).The task force of endocrine societies from Canada, USA and Australia has provided recentguidelines for therapeutic use of androgens in women. They recommended againstmaking a diagnosis of androgen deficiency in women because this clinical syndrome hasnot been defined properly. In spite of some data of clinical effectiveness of androgen replacement in selected population of women, there are no adequate indications andevidence of safety in long term administration. They recommend well designed and focused studies of androgen action in the population of women after surgical castration, inwomen with hypopituitarrism and adrenal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS Scientific studies and clinical experiences have not provided until now the answers to thequestion: »Whom to treat, when, why and for how long should androgens be used for HRTin postmenopausal women?«

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.322
GPT teacher head0.555
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicHormonal and reproductive studies→French-language works237,207→