MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6998922705

Bible through the Ages: an exhibit to honour Dr. Fraikin, Queen's University Theological College

2002· other· en· W6998922705 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2002
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonourHebrew BibleHebrewGermanOld TestamentKingdom
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bible Through the Ages \nLibrary Exhibit, 6 December 2002 - 26 January 2003 \nOn display are selected items from the Jordan Library's collection \nof about 1200 Bibles, representing many historically significant \nversions. Included are facsimiles of early illuminated manuscripts \nand printed editions from 1491 to 2001 in various translations and \nversions in some sixty languages, with and without illustration, in \nformats large and small. \nAbout sixty Bibles (or parts of Bibles) were exhibited in seven \ncases arranged in the following categories by chronology, \nlanguage, version or other feature: \nEarly manuscript reproductions \nManuscripts in Hebrew and Latin, including the Book of Kells \n(Trinity College Dublin) and the Biblia Pauperum. \nEarly printed editions \nEditions in Hebrew, Latin and Greek, including a reproduction \nof the Gutenberg Bible. 17th and 18th century editions with \nengraved title-pages also are featured, as shown in the following illustrations. \nNotable English translations \nIncluded: Tyndale, Coverdale, Bishops', Geneva, Douai, and the role of King James whose \nauthorized version of 1611 continues to be used today. Various anomalies of translation also \nare represented -- the so-called "She", "He", and "Breeches" Bibles. \nAround the world in many languages \nIncluded: Luther's German text and the French Louis Segond \nversion. The role of the British and Foreign Bible Society in \ndisseminating the Bible is described. \nCanadian Bibles - early imprints \nThe role of the Canadian Bible Society and others in fostering the \ntranslation of the Bible into many native North American \nlanguages are acknowledged. \nMiniatures and interesting bindings and illustrations \nIncluded: a "finger" Bible and the beautifully illustrated editions by \nSalvador Dali and Gustave Doré. Also featured is a rare 1635 \nmetrical psalm book, where some tunes are printed upside down on facing pages, so that \none book could be used by singers on either side of the choir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2020.081

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→French-language works237,207→