MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999073709

Characterization of the Rumen Bacterial Communities of Bison Heifers Fed a Grass-Based Diet vs a Grain-Based Free-Choice Diet

2021· article· en· W6999073709 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBison bisonRumenHerdPopulationBovidaeLivestockGrasslandGrazing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A century ago, the North American grasslands and prairie ecosystems were dominated by bison. At least 30 million bison roamed the Great Plains when the first explorers arrived. By 1900, there were little over a thousand bison remained in the United States and Canada. Recovery efforts has been made since the 20th century to reestablish the herds and increase the bison population. Today, over 500,000 bison are distributed across North America, with more than 90% of the existing bison population under commercial production. Modern conservation strategies are made via the collaborative efforts of conservationist, producers, and researchers, resulting in increased number of proposed research to better understand bison’s biology. Given that the ruminal bacterial communities of North American bison are one of the most understudied areas of bison research, the aim of the current study was to determine and compare the diversity and composition of ruminal bacteria between bison heifers on two different diets at two different ranches. Stomach tubing was used to collect rumen fluid from lifetime grass-fed heifers between 25 and 30 months of age distributed between 2 ranches located in Standing-Butte (SBR; n=17), SD, and Blue-Creek (BCR; n=17), NE, respectively. A second set of samples was collected after the same individuals had been transitioned to a grain-based free-choice diet for 100 days. Bacterial composition was determined by Illumina MiSeq (2×300) sequencing of PCR amplicons generated from the V1-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Next-Generation Sequence data was analyzed using a combination of custom Perl scripts, and publicly available software (Mothur v.1.40, RDP classifier and NCBI Blast). Taxonomic analysis identified Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes as the dominant phyla across all samples analyzed. A total of 57,132 and 59,133 specieslevel Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) were identified in SBR and BCR grass-fed heifers, respectively, in contrast to 13,240 and 22,516 OTUs that were found in the same animals on a grain-based diet. A comparative analysis using the most abundant OTUs from each group was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis sum-rank test. In the Standing Butte heifers, 28 abundant OTUs were found to be different between diets (P < 0.05), including Bb-00031 (𝑥grass = 0.04% vs 𝑥grain = 1.45%) and Bb-00018 (𝑥grass = 0.58% vs 𝑥grain = 0.06%). In the Blue Creek heifers, 17 of the most abundant OTUs were found to be different between diets (P < 0.05), including Bb-00046 (𝑥grass = 1.24% vs𝑥grain = 0.45%) and Bb-00058 (𝑥grass = 0.03% vs𝑥grain = 1.22%). Together these results indicate that the rumen of the North American bison harbors highly diverse bacterial communities that undergo dramatic changes in response to changes in diet, and they represent a starting point towards a better understanding of their rumen microbiome, leading to prospective practical applications to bison conservation and production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University)Same topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207