MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999320230

A comparison of tobacco use among Saskatchewan First Nations, Métis, and non-Aboriginal youth: Factors associated with youth tobacco use

2012· article· en· W6999320230 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTobacco usePublic healthYouth smokingYouth Risk Behavior SurveyAdolescent healthCultivation of tobacco
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tobacco use among youth is a serious public health concern because the age of initiation affects one's subsequent health status. Mounting evidence shows that tobacco use among Aboriginal youth is higher than in the general population; however, differences in prevalence rates between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal youth have yet to be explained. The purpose of this project was to describe and compare the tobacco use behaviours of First Nations, Métis, and non-Aboriginal youth in the Saskatchewan Youth Attitudes Survey (SYAS). This project involved a sub-analysis of data from 2605 Saskatchewan youth who took part in the 1996 Saskatchewan Youth Attitudes Survey. The purpose of the SYAS was to identify high-risk behaviours, and included two questions on tobacco use. Based on self-reported ethnicity, these youth were grouped into three Aboriginal status categories: non-Aboriginal, First Nations, and Métis. Chi-square tests and ANOVA were used to compare First Nations, Métis, and non-Aboriginal youth tobacco use on the basis of demographic, social, psychological, behavioural, and spiritual variables. Logistic regression was used to develop three models of the factors associated with First Nations, Métis, and non-Aboriginal youth tobacco use; these models were compared and contrasted. Tobacco use significantly differed between the Aboriginal status groups. First Nations youth were more likely to use cigarettes/cigars (79.3%) and chewing tobacco (30.5%), than Métis youth (78.3% and 25.0%, respectively), followed by non-Aboriginal (60.1% and 25.3%, respectively). Sexual intercourse, parental discipline, school attachment, preoccupation with death, drug use, gang activity, alcohol use, and family cohesiveness, were significant factors associated with non-Aboriginal tobacco use, while age, personal control, alcohol use, preoccupation with death, and drug use were significantly associated with First Nations youth. Only drug use, alcohol use, school attachment and gang activity were significantly associated with Métis youth tobacco use. The results of this study confirm the importance of ethnicity as a factor associated with tobacco use. Non-Aboriginal, First Nations, and Métis youth share certain factors associated with tobacco use; however, a number of differences also exist between these groups. These results may inform health professionals and may guide the development of tobacco reduction programs and interventions that are sensitive to ethnic differences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicSmoking Behavior and CessationFrench-language works237,207