Contribución al léxico asturleonés: vocabulario de Armellada de Orbigo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contribución al léxico asturleonés: Vocabulario de Arrnellada dc Órbigo eEl tema de la presente comunicación no se refiere al bable propiamente dicho, si por 'bable' entendemos la lengua hablada en el Principado de Asturias.Las fronteras naturales nos obligan a situarnos en el espacio geográfico de la provincia de León.Allí, entre La Magdalena y La Bañeza, por una parte, y El Bierzo y León capital, por otra, se encuentra, en la zona media de la Ribera del brbigo, Armellada, un pueblo que, por ser el mío, he tomado como representativo de una modalidad lingüística en la que subsiste^ =nos cuuntos rzsgcs de t i p ~ fa~ktica, m rfológico y sintáctico, relacionables con las hablas asturianas, especialmente con !las occidentales.A modo de ejemplo se pueden citar: la pervivencia de los diptongos /éi, óu/, cuya vitalidad es plena en la toponimia, así como el sonido /e/, procedente del grupo inicial /pl-/; conservación de /f-/ latina, -4 emplmeo de las formas adjetivo-posesivas precedidas de artículo, colocación de los pronombres átonos con preferencia detrás del verbo, etc. 8No voy a enumerar aquí otros muchos aspectos, cosa que ya hicimos en otro momento l.En esta oca-1 H . Martínez, ~Pervivencia del asturiano en una mna leonesa~,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".