MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999349344

Conifer density increases in semi-desert habitats of British Columbia in the absence of fire

2007· article· en· W6999349344 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Exchange (Washington State University) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsWestern Forest Products
FundersCanadian Forest ServiceU.S. Forest ServiceMinistry of Environment
KeywordsExclosureVegetation (pathology)PopulationOvergrazing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We determined whether or not conifer density has changed over time in the hottest and driest areas of the south Okanagan and lower Similkameen valleys in British Columbia, Canada. These grassland and savannah habitats are important for biodiversity and species at risk in Canada, and there is some discussion as to whether conifer establishment is occurring. Densities of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) were compared between airphotos from 1938 to 1985, and from 1985 to 1996 in study sites 10- to 183-ha in size. Air photos were scanned and georeferenced to ensure spatial congruency between years. The location and area of wildfires in the intervening periods were also recorded. A three-way ANCOVA, with site area as the covariable, tested the effects of fire, latitudinal category (north versus south), and biogeoclimatic (ecological) zone (ponderosa pine versus Bunchgrass) on changes in conifer density between years. The results showed an overall significant increase in density in unburned sites from 1938 to 1985, and from 1985 to 1996. Despite some inconsistent sites, fire resulted in an overall decrease in density. Neither biogeoclimatic zone nor latitude affected conifer density change over time. Stem densities in 1938, 1985 and 1996 were similar between latitudinal category and biogeoclimatic zone, except for the hottest and driest combination, in the south, in the lower elevation Bunchgrass biogeoclimatic zone, which had less than half the stem density of the other areas. However, the rate of change in stem density of conifers in unburned sites did not differ because of latitude or biogeoclimatic zone. Our results show that coniferous trees are capable of establishing in even these dry semi-desert sites, and prescribed burns might be considered for restoring grassland and savannah habitat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it