MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999509142

Controversias religiosas y circulacion de noticias impresas. Sobre las variantes editoriales de la “Relatione dello scisma anglicano” por Angelo Galioto

2025· book-chapter· en· W6999509142 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGloryMartyrSchismQueen (butterfly)Order (exchange)NoticeThe RenaissanceQuarter (Canadian coin)Middle Ages
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1597, the Franciscan Observant friar Angelo Galioto, Master of Theology and Philosophy, published a pro-Catholic text entitled Relatione dello scisma anglicano, e del glorioso martirio del b.p.f. Giovanni Foresta francescano osservante: e di altri santi martiri d’Inghilterra nella persecutione d’Enrico Ottavo (Palermo, Giovanni Antonio De Franceschi). The work was dedicated to Ludovico Foresta, a relative of Blessed Giovanni, who had been the confessor of the Queen of England Catherine of Aragon and had suffered detention and martyrdom (1538) for having disapproved of the sovereign in his plan for divorce. The work had a clear apologetic purpose, as it was not limited to describing the different stages of the schism but clearly advocated the Catholic revenge of Princess Mary against Elizabeth of England. The author also took the opportunity to celebrate an illustrious victim of the persecuted Catholicism, thus spreading glory over the Franciscan Observant Order to which both he and the martyr belonged. Finally, it is very interesting to notice the existence of two different emissions for the same edition; in fact, the second version offers a more extensive and updated account of the Catholics’ persecutions in England during the last quarter of the 16th century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.022
Scholarly communication0.0330.028
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.)Same topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207