MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6999612804

Culture of wilderness retreat in the Algoma region: decompostable architecture along the Agawa River

2021· dissertation· en· W6999612804 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSpatial and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWildernessContext (archaeology)SituatedResource (disambiguation)Wilderness areaInterpretation (philosophy)UnderpinningEphemeral keyArchitecture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Candian Wilderness has the potential
\nto create social, mental, spiritual and
\nphysical advantages within modern
\nculture. The study of these advantages
\nassociated with the context of the
\nWilderness and the city has led to a
\nproposal that explores the habitable space
\nin between. This thesis proposes a better
\nbalance between the Wilderness and
\nthe City. With the creation of a retreat; a
\nplace to escape the city and live simply in
\nthe landscape. Inhabiting the Wilderness
\nwithout the distractions of technological
\ncommunication will allow the inhabitants
\nto “enjoy the freedom from the grip of
\nthe external world,”
\n1
\n a necessary step to
\nbetter establish a relationship with the
\nlandscape. The Retreat is a place that is
\nsituated deep in the Wilderness in order
\nto gain the benefits from its context until
\nthe inhabitant’s eventual return to the city.
\nProgrammatic characters are meshed
\ntogether informing habitation, form,
\nmaterial and construction. Creating a
\nspace that is directly shaped by the flora
\nand topography and satisfies the essential
\nelements of survival. Camps or in-between
\nspaces are part of Canadian culture and
\nact as a resource for rest, creation and
\nexploration, rather than a resource for
\neconomic growth. This change can be
\nseen in the Algoma region of Ontario
\nw here infrastructure built for resource
\nextraction and transportation has been
\ntransformed to include opportunities for
\nWilderness exploration, interpretation and
\nescape. Communities of people living and
\nworking in the Wilderness of Algoma as well as Canadian artists have created
\nspaces in between for themselves,
\nin doing so, they created a culture of
\nWilderness habitation.
\nThe Agawa Retreat is an exploration in
\nWilderness habitation. Situated along the
\nAgawa River the Agawa Retreat acts as
\na prototype where human occupants and
\nthe Wilderness interact on a personal level.
\nThis is achieved with the use of modern
\nmapping and modeling techniques and a
\nunique approach to material selection. The
\nWilderness acts as both the site context
\nand occupant, resulting in an approach
\nto a building life-cycle that considers
\nhabitation one phase of decomposition
\nand renewal. The Agawa Retreat is a
\nunique building typology that is adaptable
\nand repeatable in almost any Wilderness
\nsetting. Its site placement, material
\nchoice and construction procedure all
\nconsider the Wilderness as a character
\nthat inhabits the proposal alongside and
\nhuman occupants. Doing so creates a
\nspace in between the Wilderness and
\nthe city where occupants can escape,
\ncreate and live simply surrounded by the
\nCanadian landscape

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it