Diyabetli Kişilerin Aktivite Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bıyık, S., Examination of the Relationship Between Factors Affecting Activity Performance of People with Diabetes,, Hacettepe University, Graduate School of Health Sciences Occupational Therapy Program, Master Thesis, Ankara, 2019. In this study, it was aimed to determine the relationship between diabetic individuals' social participation level, occupational performances, quality of life, interests, anxiety levels, job performances and social support perceptions. The study was conducted in Hacettepe University Department of Occupational Therapy. 46 diabetic subjects with a mean age of 45.97 ± 8.40 years and 46 non-diabetic subjects with 45.97 ± 8.40 years participated in our study. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale, Interest Checklist, Community Integration Inventory and Job Content Questionnaire were used to evaluate the groups. In addition, performance problems were assessed with Canada Occupational Performance Measurement and quality of life was assessed with Diabetes Quality of Life Scale. Difficulties experienced by people with diabetes at work were examined with the semi-structured interview. Disability Assessment Scale was used as inclusion criteria. It was found that anxiety level, perception of social support, interests and social participation of people with diabetes were no different from those without diabetes (p> 0.05). While the job content of the people with diabetes was similar to those without diabetes, job security was found to be significantly lower (p <0.05). It was found that the quality of life of diabetic patients with complications was lower than those without complications (p <0.05). Diabetes was observed to affect the occupational performance of individuals. Diabetic individuals with activity performance problems had lower quality of life (p <0.05). It was concluded that examining the activity-role (occupational) participation of individuals with diabetes with a holistic perspective of occupational therapy can contribute significantly to guide the interdisciplinary treatment plan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".