EBIS, Volume 3, Issue 2, May, 1993
Bibliographic record
Abstract
European Biotechnology Information Service (EBIS) Newsletter Volume 3\nIssue 2 (May, 1993) Published on behalf of the Commission of the\nEuropean Communities by ASFRA BV, Voorhaven 33, 1135 BL EDAM, The\nNetherlands. Code: NL93028 Size of Files: Text: 42K Graphics: No\nassociated graphics files CONTENTS Editorial: Towards the Greening of\nIndustry I. Community Activities (Commission,Parliament, Council) FP4\nRevised Working Document DGXII Reorganisation Biotechnology Second Call\nBiochemical Engineering Science Methods of Communicating Biotechnology\nwith the Public Global Perspective 2010: The Case of Biotechnology\nSkill Shortages in Europe Sequence related databases in Europe Eurotech\nCapital and Eurotech Innvest II. Member States BioEurope '93 Germany --\nAmendment of Genetic Engineering Law Italy -- Bioinformatics The\nNetherlands -- Network Approach United Kingdom -- Biotechnology Friend\nor Foe? III. International Developments OECD -- Safety Evaluation of\nFoods Council of Europe Canada -- National Research Council USA -- ABC\nConference IV. Reports Received ECCO -- Information Centre Ecological\nRisks Report Biochemical Engineering Science
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.163 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".