Dissociation : Vol. 4, No. 4, p. 205-213 : The dissociative table technique: a strategy for working with ego states in dissociative disorders and ego-state therapy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are various ways to contact alter personalities (ego states) in Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD) and other dissociative disorders.This paperpresents one such strategy that the author has developed over the past decade working with such patients.Keeping in mind that therapists must constantly be on guard against the iatrogenic creation of alter personalities, there are nonetheless ways in which the inner ego states previously formed and already operating in the patient s life can be learned prior to any therapeutic intervention.This assures that the search for these inner states is lead by cues from the patient and not from the therapist.This writing will outline an inter-related series oftechniques which should prove helpful to those seeking a strategy to access the inner ego system ofthose sufferingfrom disorders ofdissociation.Not only is this a technique Jor accessing alter personalities, but it also offers additional strategies to assist the work with these alters throughout the course oftherapy.It is not a therapy in itself, but rather a group of adjunctive strategies to be used in conjunction with the clinical approach ofthe therapist who may wish to use this technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it