MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6999989186

Effects of ground predators, abiotic factors and plant density on the flea beetles, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze) and Phyllotreta striolata (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

2024· dissertation· en· W6999989186 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlea beetleCanolaFleaCotyledonRacemeBrassica rapaBrassicaHerbivoreAbiotic componentBrassica oleracea
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crucifer flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and the striped flea beetle, Phyllotreta striolata (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), are prominent economic pests to canola crops, Brassica napus, (L.) (Brassicaceae) in the Canadian prairies, by defoliating canola seedlings, resulting in recurring yield losses. Current management strategies in the Canadian prairies rely heavily on chemical control via both seed-coated and foliar spray treatments. To limit chemical pesticide applications due to potential adverse environmental effects, there has been a focus on alternative flea beetle management strategies including altering plant density and determining potential natural enemies. In addition, few studies have demonstrated how temperature and plant density affect flea beetle feeding and there is little known about the factors affecting stem feeding on canola seedlings. Laboratory studies in petri dishes and microcosms were completed to examine effects of temperature, plant density and predators on cotyledon and stem feeding by both species of flea beetles in terms of damage intensity and prevalence. Both species defoliated similar amounts, suggesting no feeding difference in species. Feeding increased with temperature and more defoliation occurred on the underside of the cotyledons. Pterostichus melanarius and Pardosa spp. reduced flea beetle abundances as well as total cotyledon defoliation. In addition, there was less cotyledon and stem damage at higher plant densities. Field studies were completed in four regions of the Canadian prairies (Lethbridge and Peace River, AB; Saskatoon, SK; and Carman, MB) over 4 years (2018 – 2021). Evidence of both the resource concentration hypotheses and a dilution effect was found as flea beetle abundance increased with plant density, yet defoliation levels generally decreased. Yield increased with plant density regardless of the management treatment or region. The knowledge gained on how flea beetles’ feeding on stems and cotyledons is affected by temperature, plant density, and predators will help for in-field scouting and assessment ratings and provide information for future research into biological control potential with the tested predators. In addition, using plant density as a flea beetle management strategy either combined with current chemical practices or as an alternative, is effective to protect yield while limiting chemical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control→French-language works237,207→