MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000068008

THE EFFECT OF ACUTE CREATINE MONOHYDRATE LOADING ON BODY COMPOSITION, STRENGTH, AND FATIGABILITY IN WOMEN

2023· article· en· W7000068008 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTopScholar (Western Kentucky University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuteal phaseCreatineMenstrual cyclePlaceboSports medicineExercise physiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Michaela Grace Alesi1, Benjamin E. Dalton2, Jacob M. McDougle3, Ginger Nee4, Darren G. Candow5, Abbie E. Smith-Ryan6, Robert Buresh4, Garrett M. Hester4, Trisha A. VanDusseldorp4. 1Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA. 2University of Guelph, Guelph, ON. 3University of Conneticut, Storrs, CT. 4Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA. 5University of Regina, Regina, SK. 6University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. BACKGROUND: Creatine monohydrate is a well-researched supplement; however, few investigations have been conducted on its effect on women, and only one study to date has factored in the phases of the menstrual cycle. Acute supplementation with creatine monohydrate during exercise has been promoted to benefit body composition and increases in strength and fatigue resistance, however, these findings are more ambiguous in women as much of the data exists from investigations of men. METHODS: Twelve recreationally trained women (22.8 ± 2.98 yrs) participated in this cross-over study, wherein they took both supplements (creatine monohydrate, CM; placebo, maltodextrin, PL) in randomized, double-blind, counterbalance order during the luteal phase of their menstrual cycle. Women were asked to perform a CM or PL loading phase of 20g per day. A 28-day washout period was allowed after the initial supplementation period. Subjects completed 5 total visits. Visit 1 included informed consent and familiarization with the fatiguing exercise protocol. Visits 2-5 comprised measures of 4-compartment body composition and fatiguing exercise on an isokinetic dynamometer. The fatiguing protocol consisted of isokinetic knee extensions at 180 deg/sec for 5 sets of 30 contractions, with 2 min of rest after each set. After each set, participants were asked their rating of perceived exertion using the Borg 1-10 scale. Fatigue index was calculated as followed: (highest peak torque-minimum peak torque)/highest peak torque × 100. Relative fatigue was calculated for each set as follows: (sum of peak toques for set 1 - sum of peak torque for set 2)/sum of peak torques for set 1 × 100. RESULTS: No significant changes for body mass (p=0.551), total body water (p=0.607), fat-free mass (p=0.789), or fat mass (p=0.943) were measured. Strength was unchanged, with no significant changes for peak torque (p=0.646). There was no change in relative fatigue (p= 0.525; p=0.525) or fatigue index (p= 0.823; p=0.149). There was no difference for rating of perceived exertion (p=0.570). CONCLUSIONS: A creatine monohydrate loading period of 20 grams per day for five days did not alter body composition, muscular strength, or fatigability in these recreationally trained women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopScholar (Western Kentucky University)Same topicMuscle metabolism and nutritionFrench-language works237,207