EFECTIVIDAD DE UNA INTERVENCIÓN EDUCATIVA A PADRES SOBRE LA ACEPTABILIDAD DE LA VACUNA CONTRA EL VIRUS DEL PAPILOMA HUMANO EN NIÑOS Y NIÑAS DE 9 A 13 AÑOS DE EDAD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To analyze the effectiveness of an educational intervention to parents on the acceptability of the vaccine against the human papillomavirus in boys and girls from 9 to 13 years of age.Materials and Methods: Observational and retrospective systematic review, which synthesizes the results of multiple primary investigations.They are an essential part of the nursing based on evidence for its rigorous methodology, identifying relevant studies to answer specific questions of clinical practice, the search has been restricted to articles with full text, and the selected ones were subjected to a critical reading, using the grade system to assign the recommendation strength.In the final selection 10 articles were chosen, it was found that 40% (04/10) correspond to the United Kingdom, with 30% (03/10) United States, while with 10% (01/10) they are Canada, Australia and the People's Republic of China respectively.Results: Of the total of articles analyzed, 60% affirm that the educational interventions to parents on the vaccine against HPV are effective for boys and girls, in relation to the acceptability of vaccination.Conclusions: It was evidenced in the researches reviewed that there is effectiveness of educational interventions for parents of boys and girls on the acceptability of the vaccine against HPV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".