Estrategias y políticas públicas para erradicar la pobreza extrema en barranquilla: efectividad o utopía; una mirada desde la perspectiva del cumplimiento de los odm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to make a diagnosis of public policies and strategies outlined in the City of Ottawa for Overcoming Extreme Poverty and Hunger, under the Millennium Agreement signed in 2000 by the Colombian State. I will analyze, identify and evaluate the scope of the public policy of the last two periods (2008-2011 and 2012-2015) that has had the city of Barranquilla focused on meeting the target of Millennium Development Goal of eradicating extreme poverty in most vulnerable sectors of the city. , Effectiveness or Utopia: The "Strategies and policies to eradicate extreme poverty in Barranquilla project a look from the perspective of the MDGs ", is the result of a survey of the current landscape of all the features of the problem, we started from the general to the particular, applying the unknown to the known and the whole to the parts . Significant progress in which theoretically proves that Barranquilla is about to reach the goals set in the MDGs are presented. According to the latest report from the UN through UNDP, extreme poverty over 8.5% to 7.4%, the 8.8% target. Thus, technically Barranquilla is doors to meet the most important goal, halving by 2015, the population living in extreme poverty
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".