MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000453434

Feeding Fusarium-infected wheat to yellow mealworm larvae (Tenebrio Molitor) to produce a safe, replacement protein source for animal feed

2019· dissertation· en· W7000453434 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirectorate for Biological SciencesEuropean Food Safety AuthorityMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsMealwormFrassLarvaMeat and bone mealFish mealAnimal feedPupaPlant proteinIngredient
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various insect species including the yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) could be an alternative and sustainable source of protein for animal feed. There is evidence that yellow mealworm larvae can utilize deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated wheat as a food source without sequestering it, producing a safe protein ingredient. This study aimed to determine the potential accumulation of DON in T. molitor larvae reared on Fusarium-infected wheat containing high levels of DON and investigate the effects of DON exposure on production, survival and nutritional traits of the larvae. Wheat containing 200 μg/kg DON was used as the control diet. A different source of wheat was sorted into six fractions and mixed to obtain three levels of DON for low (2,000 μg/kg), medium (10,000 μg/kg) and high (12,000 μg/kg) treatments. Each treatment was replicated five times with 300 or 200 mealworms per replicate for the feeding and breeding trials, respectively. Trial termination was determined when the first two pupae were observed (32-34 days). There was no difference in the levels of DON detected in the larvae between treatments and ranged from 121.8±19.3 to 136.4±40.5 μg/kg (P=0.883). Excretion of DON in pooled frass samples was 131.0, 324.0, 230.4 and 742.1 μg/kg for control, low, medium and high, respectively. The concentrations of 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-ADON) detected in frass ranged from 279.5 to 326.4 μg/kg, whereas levels in larvae ranged from 65.3 to 66.2 μg/kg and were from undetectable to 204.9 μg/kg in wheat. Nutritional analysis on pooled samples from both trials showed maximum levels of crude protein (CP) of 52% and crude fat (CF) of 36%. Ash, fiber, chitin, fatty-acids and amino-acids content were consistent across treatments. Survival was greater than 96% for all life stages in both trials. In the feeding trial, average daily gain (ADG) ranged from 1.9±0.1 to 2.1±0.1 mg/day per mealworm. Less than 1.2% of the ingested DON was accumulated by larvae when they consumed Fusarium-infected wheat containing levels up to 12,000 μg/kg. These results along with the lack of effect on the nutritional profile, survival, or production traits, supports using DON-contaminated wheat in large-scale production of mealworms to produce a sustainable, safe protein source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInsect Utilization and EffectsFrench-language works237,207