MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000454653

EU 2009 report on policy coherence for development. Commission staff working document accompanying the report of the Commission to the Council. SEC (2009) 1137 final, 17 September 2009

2009· other· en· W7000454653 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh) · 2009
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Fund for Agricultural DevelopmentInternational Development Research CentreInternational Fine Particle Research Institute
KeywordsCommissionTreasuryTransparency (behavior)DirectiveCabinet (room)RevenueMember statesEconomic Justice
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Joint Statement by the Council and the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting the Council,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0160.007
Open science0.0050.008
Research integrity0.0180.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh)French-language works237,207