MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000539156

An Evaluation of Bigmouth Buffalo (Ictiobus cyprinellus) and Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio) Association within the Qu'Appelle River System and its Implications for Species Conservation

2023· dissertation· en· W7000539156 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCommon carpHabitatCommon speciesOverwinteringEndangered speciesCarpAquatic animal
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bigmouth buffalo (Ictiobus cyprinellus) is a fish species at risk in the Qu’Appelle River system of Saskatchewan, Canada. Little is known about their behaviours or how they have been impacted by the introduction of invasive common carp (Cyprinus carpio) into the system. As such, I had several main objectives within my study: 1) to determine the large-scale movements of bigmouth buffalo; 2) to assess whether bigmouth buffalo and common carp associate within Buffalo Pound Lake; 3) to determine which environmental factors (if any) affected the habitat selection of either species; and 4) to report other findings that may be relevant for species management. I captured and surgically implanted bigmouth buffalo and common carp with acoustic telemetry tags and recorded their movements. I then modeled my findings using R to determine association and the effect of environmental factors on their habitat selection. I found that bigmouth buffalo captured in Buffalo Pound Lake did not move throughout the Qu’Appelle River, and instead preferred to remain within the lake itself. Common carp left the lake during spawning to go upstream to a known spawning site, but bigmouth buffalo did not. I also discovered that outside of the May spawning period, the two species do not typically associate. Instead of spending more time in the shallows as we would expect, bigmouth buffalo were instead found in more open waters, while carp preferred the warm shallows. Even in the winter when overwintering space is limited, the two species did not associate. Both macrophyte presence and daily maximum noise had negative effects on habitat selection. Daily mean temperature did also have an effect, though this effect changed depending on the region of the lake. As temperature is consistent throughout the lake, it may be an indicator of some behavioural difference or instance of competition between the two species. Overall, I found that there is a possibility that competitive exclusion may be occurring. However, further research must be done to conclusively determine whether this is the case. Particularly as bigmouth buffalo are not recruiting as much and grow much slower than common carp do, which may lead to local extirpation once the population becomes too old.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207