MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000554473

Farklı göç politikaları bağlamında ev hizmetlerinde çalışan kadınlar: Kanada ve Türkiye örneği

2012· other· tr· W7000554473 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMarmara University Open Access System · 2012
Typeother
Languagetr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Labor Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurkishContext (archaeology)Government (linguistics)Migrant workersWork (physics)Turkish economy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bu çalışmada, uluslararası emek göçü bağlamında ev işlerinde çalışan kadınlara yönelik Türkiye ve Kanada’nın farklı göç politikaları analiz edilmiştir. Göç deneyimi bakımından oldukça uzun bir geçmişe sahip olan Kanada’nın, ev işlerinde çalışan göçmen kadınlara yönelik özel bir göç programı bulunmaktadır. Mevcut programlar arasında en iyi örneklerden biri sayılan bu programa rağmen, ev işçisi kadınlar sömürüye açık ve kötü çalışma koşullarına sahiptir. Öte yandan, Türkiye’de ev işçisi göçmen kadınlar izinsiz göçün bir parçasıdır. Son yıllarda Türkiye’de de bu alanda yeni düzenlemeler yapılmaya başlamıştır. Her iki ülkenin birbirinden farklı göç politikaları olmasına rağmen, ev işçisi göçmen kadınların birbirine benzer koşullara sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu bağlamda, göçmen kadınların iş ve işveren değişmelerine olanak verilmediği dolayısıyla devlet eliyle kölelik benzeri koşullarda çalışmak zorunda bırakıldıkları tespit edilmiştir. \n\nAnahtar Kelimeler: Uluslararası Kadın Göçü, Emek Göçü, Göçmen Ev İşçileri, Göçmen Bakıcılar.\nABSTRACT\n\nThis study analyzes labour migration policies of Canada and Turkey on domestic women workers within the context of global labour movement. Canada as a country with a long history of labour migration has a specific program for domestic workers. Even though this program is accepted as one of the best examples in the world, it has many structural problems that leave the migrant workers vulnerable to exploitative work conditions. On the other hand, migrant domestic workers in Turkey are largely unregulated and considered to be a part of the undocumented migration. However, in recent years the Turkish government has made attempts to bring some regulations in this area. Our comparative study demonstrates that although the migration policies of both countries considerably differ from each other, migrant domestic workers face similar challenges. Most notably, the restrictions put on their mobility and right to change employers reveal a form of indentured labour facilitated by the governments. \n\nKey Words: International migration of women, labour migration, domestic migrant workers, migrant care givers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0100.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarmara University Open Access SystemSame topicMigration and Labor DynamicsFrench-language works237,207