HUBUNGAN ANTARA PERBANDINGAN SOSIAL DAN PEER PRESSURE DENGAN QUARTER LIFE CRISIS PADA WANITA DEWASA AWAL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara perbandingan sosial dan peer pressure dengan quarter life crisis pada wanita dewasa awal. Subjek penelitian pada penelitian ini merupakan wanita dewasa awal (N=422). Teknik sampling yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teknik non probability sampling berupa purposive sampling. Dengan rumus penentuan jumlah sampel menggunakan rumus Lemeshow dengan jumlah minimal responden sebesar 384 dengan tingkat kesalahan 5%. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengukur perbandingan sosial adalah Iowa-Netherlands Comparison Orientation Scale Measure (INCOM) oleh Gibbons, F.X. & Buunk (1999) yang telah diterjemahkan oleh Amalia (2019), Peer Pressure Inventory (PPI) yang telah diterjemahkan oleh Anjariyah (2020), dan alat ukur quarter life crisis yang disusun oleh peneliti sendiri berdasarkan teori Robbins dan Wilner (2001). Proses pengumpulan data dilakukan secara online dengan menyebarkan link kuesioner melalui media sosial. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis korelasi linear berganda dengan menggunakan bantuan software SPSS versi 25.0 for windows. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) terdapat hubungan positif yang signifikan antara perbandingan sosial dengan quarter life crisis, dengan tingkat koefisien korelasi sebesar 0.485; (2) terdapat hubungan positif yang signifikan antara peer pressure dengan quarter life crisis, dengan tingkat koefisien korelasi sebesar 0.120; (3) terdapat hubungan positif yang signifikan antara perbandingan sosial dan peer pressure terhadap quarter life crisis, dengan tingkat koefisien korelasi sebesar 0.498. This research aims to determine the relationship between social comparison and peer pressure with quarter life crisis in early adult women. The research subjects in this study were early adult women (N = 422). The sampling technique used in this study was a non-probability sampling technique in the form of purposive sampling. With the formula for determining the number of samples using the Lemeshow formula with a minimum number of respondents of 384 with an error rate of 5%. The instrument used to measure social comparison is the Iowa-Netherlands Comparison Orientation Scale Measure (INCOM) by Gibbons, F.X. & Buunk (1999) which has been translated by Amalia (2019), the Peer Pressure Inventory (PPI) which has been translated by Anjariyah (2020), and the quarter life crisis measuring instrument compiled by the researcher himself based on the theory of Robbins and Wilner (2001). The data collection process was carried out online by distributing questionnaire links through social media. Data analysis in this study used multiple linear correlation analysis with the help of SPSS software version 25.0 for windows. This research result shows that: (1) there is a significant positive correlation between social comparison and quarter life crisis, with a correlation coefficient of 0.485; (2) there is a significant positive correlation between peer pressure and quarter life crisis, with a correlation coefficient of 0.120; (3) there is a significant positive correlation between social comparison and peer pressure with quarter life crisis, with a correlation coefficient of 0.498.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".