MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7000886913

Geography of socio-demographic change of small towns in Latvia, 2000-2021

2024· dissertation· lv· W7000886913 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueE-resource repository of the University of Latvia (University of Latvia) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languagelv
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanization and City Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationPeriod (music)Feature (linguistics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Context (archaeology)PropositionRegional geography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maģistra darbā “Sociāli demogrāfisko pārmaiņu ģeogrāfija Latvijas mazajās pilsētās no 2000. līdz 2021. gadam” analizētas sociāli demogrāfiskās pārmaiņas Latvijas mazajās pilsētās. Latvijā kopš 2000. gada iedzīvotāju skaits sarucis par 21% un pieejamās prognozes liecina, ka šī tendence turpināsies. Tomēr sarukums nav vienmērīgs visā valsts teritorijā un bijis atšķirīgs dažādos laika periodos. Latvijas apdzīvojumā vislielākais iedzīvotāju skaita sarukums skāris tieši mazās pilsētas, kur tas kopš 2000. gada samazinājies par 26,5%. Pētījumam par sociāli demogrāfiskajām pārmaiņām mazajās pilsētās izmantoti pēdējo trīs tautas skaitīšanu materiāli un vairākas statistiskās datu analīzes metodes. Darba rezultāti ļauj izprast mazo pilsētu sociāli demogrāfiskās attīstības tendences, ģeogrāfiskās atšķirības, kā arī iedzīvotāju skaita sarukumu un pārmaiņas visvairāk ietekmējušos rādītājus. Darbu veido anotācija, ievads, sešas nodaļas un secinājumi, kā arī izmantotās literatūras saraksts. Teksta kopējais apjoms ir 69 lapaspuses. Raksturvārdi: pilsētu sarukšana, sociāli demogrāfiskās pārmaiņas, mazās pilsētas, tautas skaitīšana.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE-resource repository of the University of Latvia (University of Latvia)Same topicUrbanization and City PlanningFrench-language works237,207