MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7001028297

Host infection stragegies determine dispersal abilities in freshwater mussels (bivalvia: Unionidae)

2009· dissertation· en· W7001028297 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaDirectorate for Biological SciencesEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility
KeywordsBiological dispersalGeneralist and specialist speciesHost (biology)JuvenileWater columnFish <Actinopterygii>HabitatBenthic zone
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unionid freshwater mussels are a highly imperiled group. Little is known about their dispersal, which is a complex process that depends on the transport of larvae (glochidia) and juveniles in the water column, and movement of their host fish during the mussels' parasitic stage. The hypothesis of this research was that specialization with respect to host infection strategy influences dispersal abilities. This was examined by comparing dispersal processes and early life history traits among Lampsilini mussels. I focused on ' Actinonaias ligamentina' that broadcasts its glochidia and was therefore considered a "generalist", and 'Epioblasma triquetra', a "specialist" that captures its host between the valves. Release experiments with stained glochidia showed that glochidia of the generalist can travel in the water column considerable distances (up to 100 m in low flow conditions), whereas glochidia of the specialist can attach directly to the trapped fish. Transport distances of juvenile mussels of both species may extend over 10s of m as suggested by a combination of field and lab experiments, if turbulent flow conditions diminish the effect of lower release heights in the water column from the specialist's benthic hosts. Examination of host fish movements were based on a mark-recapture study and a literature review, which indicated that the specialist's host fish has significantly shorter movement distances (10s of m) than host fish of the generalist (100s of m to km). In addition, the conservation statuses of mussels in Ontario appear to be associated with the movement distances of their host fish. Overall, the generalist (broadcaster) has considerably larger dispersal distances than the specialist (host capture), which is reflected in the findings that early life history traits relevant for dispersal differ considerably between broadcasting and host capture species. Other species that attract hosts with mimetic mantle flaps and packages of glochidia (conglutinates) fill positions between these extremes with respect to both dispersal abilities and early life history traits. This study demonstrates that dispersal distances can differ considerably among mussel species, but are predictable based on their ecology, which is a crucial first step to understand connectivity of populations and to develop sound conservation strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)→Same topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior→French-language works237,207→