MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001036003

Immigration Related Trauma Among Haitians: Barriers to Treatment and the Role of Faith in Creating Resiliency

2023· article· en· W7001036003 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars Crossing (Liberty University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowball samplingImmigrationFaithLived experienceQualitative researchInterpretative phenomenological analysisAcculturationFeeling
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The topic of this writer’s dissertation is immigration-related trauma among Haitians, barriers to treatment, and the role of faith in creating resiliency. The purpose of this qualitative push and pull hermeneutic phenomenological study is to understand the lived experiences of people who have immigrated to the United States (US). To better understand these lived experiences, it is imperative to also examine the experiences of Haitian immigrants from the gateway countries of Brazil, Chile, Canada, and the Dominican Republic. It is known that a number of Haitians have entered the US directly (legally or illegally) and a great many entered by way of the above gateway countries. As we will later see these countries throughout their histories have adopted laws that welcomed Haitians and later repealed those same laws, creating mass deportations. Through these deportations, many Haitians have undertaken dangerous journeys into the US. This study will evaluate effective treatment in addressing the multidimensional needs of this population, including barriers to treatment and the role the church or religious community can play in creating resiliency amongst this population. Study participants engaged through in-depth semi-structured interviews to explore the lived experiences of these immigrant Haitians. The interviews assessed for possible Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) diagnosis or reported symptoms of PTSD as part of participants’ lived experiences. Two sampling methods were utilized: purposeful sampling and snowball sampling. The data analysis method used was the Colaizzi’s method of data analysis, as it requires participants to validate findings to ensure they are accurate and credible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholars Crossing (Liberty University)Same topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207