MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7001044885

Illness experiences and settler colonialism: an ethnography with Indigenous Peoples receiving in-centre hemodialysis in Winnipeg, Manitoba

2023· dissertation· en· W7001044885 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousRacismEthnographyHealth careSocial determinants of healthQualitative researchHealth equitySocioeconomic statusMental health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2015, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) set a national agenda, calling for institutions to develop concrete plans to advance the health and socioeconomic status of Indigenous peoples in Canada. Indigenous peoples experience a variety of health disparities, including alarming rates of end-stage kidney disease, also known as kidney failure. In Canada, most people with kidney failure start in-centre (hospital-based) hemodialysis. Manitoba has the highest prevalence and incidence of kidney failure in Canada, and Indigenous people are disproportionately represented. This qualitative ethnographic study employed Indigenous methodologies, including a conversational approach with people living with end-stage kidney disease. I conducted 11 in-depth individual interviews—six with people undergoing in-centre hemodialysis, three with caregivers, and two with healthcare providers working in renal health. Drawing upon critical anti-colonial and social determinants of health frameworks, colonization is reconceptualized as a present structure rather than a past event. This perspective brings into view how institutional practices continue to produce health inequities. Specifically, this study pursued a multi-sited approach to examine the interplay between the social determinants of health and people’s personal journeys amid a sense of dislocation. I followed the trajectories of people who were displaced from their communities and forced to relocate to Winnipeg for hemodialysis. As people navigated abrupt life changes and rebuilt their lives amid crisis, I portray their experiences of grief and disconnection from kinship networks as well as their diverse conceptualizations of health and wellbeing. I also portray their experiences of discrimination and racism in hemodialysis units, emergency departments, specialized care, and while seeking health and social services, such as housing. These experiences demonstrate the urgency for mandatory cultural safety training for those working in healthcare. This thesis project is unique in its approach to examining barriers and facilitators to care in the context of kidney failure by exploring the relationship between broader structural forces, including settler colonialism, and the lived experiences of Indigenous people receiving hemodialysis in Winnipeg. As health institutions direct resources to address the TRC Calls to Action, I provide recommendations to the Manitoba Renal Program to increase relevant resources for Indigenous people on hemodialysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0260.015
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→